Monday, June 11, 2012
Utrum omnia nomina divina paganorum sint nomina demonum
Videtur nullum esse deum paganorum quin nomen eius sit nomen demonis.
Primo quia inter duo opposita, si de uno dicitur omnes, de altero intelligitur nullus: set dicitur in psalmo omnes dii ethnicorum demonia sunt, ergo nullus est deus paganorum quin sit demon et nullum nomen divinum paganorum quin sit nomen demonicum.
Secundo quia demon est qui pulsat ad malum, principaliter, set eciam hi dei paganorum qui dicuntur fuisse mortales pulsant ad malum per malum exemplum, utpote Hercules ad iracundiam, Antinous ad lascivitatem, ambo ad vicium contra naturam, ergo sunt demonici et nomen utriusque et aliorum nomen est demonicum.
Set contra est: in secundo beati Luce scriptum est "exiit edictum a Caesare Augusto ut describeretur universus orbis" cui edicto optemperavit sanctus Ioseph. Set obedire edicta demonum peccatum est, ergo Cesar Augustus suo tempore et in historia, sacra et alia, principalius est nomen hominis quam nomen demonis. Quamvis certe iam fuit demonicus cultus eum in templis suis adorare.
Respondeo esse dicendum quod in quocumque cultu pagano adest demon recipiens honorem deo vero debito, set non quodcumque nomen quod invocatur est per se nomen demonis, set quiddam modo occasionaliter fit per indebitam invocationem. Sic nonnulli fuerunt mortales qui suo tempore vel post mortem facti sunt idoli, et interdum eodem nomine usi sunt falsam invocationem facientes et verum deum invocantes, quod in Arabica et Greca linguis presertim videtur. Nam Allah dicitur et a Christianis Terra Sancta vel Egypti vel et Melite viventibus, de Deo Uno et Trino, de Deo vero: et ante plenitudinem veritatis a poëtis dictum est nomen Zeus a poëtis ita ut Christianus legens quedam excerpta non potest Deum Verum non intelligere.
Ad primum dicendum est quod quamvis nullus sit deus cultus erronei quin sit demon, interdum nomen habet communem cum aliquo non demonico, utputa fratre nostro sole, qui creatura est Dei veri.
Ad secundum dicendum est quod non unus est tantum inimicus anime, set tres: caro, mundus et demon. Si post mortem "Hercules" et "Antinous" pulsaverunt ad malum inquantum demones erant cultum indebitum recipientes, in vita interdum id fecerunt inquantum mala exempla, quod autem pertinet ad mundum, non ita ad demonem. Set aliqui in vita et ad bona pulsaverunt, bonis exemplis, sicut patet de Enea.
Friday, June 1, 2012
[An Author's Aside]
Since I started this fan fiction novel, troubles have been coming but also apparently not from readers or anyone in particular, council, advice. Or what seems to suggest itself as such by the things I read. It irritates me.
Like this thing about Planet Narnia: if Narnia books are astrologically set to Seven Classical Planets*, to what tune goes this? Uranus, Neptunus and, is Pluto a planet? One obvious answer is: to none. This is not a Narnia book. It is set in England and the only ground which hails to the name of Narnia is Narnese rather than Narnian. It is in Umbria in Italy, as author of original series well knew. It is set on earth, and if earth being central to universe and still without motion has no tune, some of its centuries do. Or one could say it is in tune with the fixed stars: a detail being that if geocentrism is true and yet sun is not center of all stars spread through space as thought by astronomers today, but fixed stars are more or less in a sphere, according to Bessel and others, they waggle a bit. But also in the sense that apart from waggling they are fixed and so is the moral law.
Susan Pevensie has naturally, without grace, a bit more courage than Ismene, or gives the impression. Yet she knows well there are laws that do not bend. Since the book is no tragedy I will not bring her to martyrdom as Antigone, but she will testify to "thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" and "thou shalt not kill" and "for anyone who scandalises one of these little ones, it would have been better if a millstone had been tied around his neck" - as a teacher in compulsory school in England, she does risk the millstone test. And, for passing it in the eyes of heaven, she pays.
But in a sense it is also another old favourite of mine apart from Narnia: Ivan Nazaroff. He knew he could not go to Chrustev and say "comrade Nikita, Christ died for my sins and yours, won't you read about it in the Bible with me"? And Susan Pevensie knew she could not stand up to England and say: "I am Queen of Narnia" - she would have aroused more panic than Jadis in London, as likely. The novels of Myrna Grant show the situation of Christians under Communism: Komsomol, Young Pioneers, Laws decreed unjustly by the party ... and teachers functioning under such laws.
Now, Psychiatry in the West has long functioned as such a Communist party. Children are materially supported even from non-wed mothers, but they are also taken away from parents more often than previous centuries and millennia. Back to days when adults were killed and children taken as slaves or for adoption by warriors whose names are known in the West. Was Attila the Hun in that branch? Genghis Khan I think was. Teachers are regularly concerned with both of these - as well as with Abortion, unless schools are Christian: not meaning every teacher gets involved personally, and when I taught for "6 months" (I was dismissed after expiration of contract) I was not approached by any teenage girl in such a situation, but if I had continued and been sufficiently respected, I am not sure how I could avoided situations in which either I would have tried to save a life by sabotaging policies about "it's her decision" (when she is approached by a pro-lifer) and "it's all for her own good" (when she is being pushed by the anti-lifers) - or earned a millstone around my neck.
Nobby was taken away from his parents in a novel by Enid Blyton: because his father goes to jail, obviously, but also because he beat him.** Now, in the novel this is seen as a humane decision, for Nobby's own good. In my fan fic, I give another side to the story. George, the daugter of Quentin and Fanny, may still have problems admitting her name is Georgina, but she is not a lesbian. Together they help Susan do what I would not think quite possible for me if I went back to non-Christian schools: so this is a cross-over of fan fictions, one in which also Father Brown and Doctor Watson (or at least a younger assistant of his) are real people whom Susan Pevensie will meet (Sherlock Holmes being already dead). Without the help of these guys, I am not sure Susan would not have continued to earn the reproach of Polly Plummer. Without the help of guys such as these, I am not sure Ivan Nazaroff could have continued to live a Christian life.
Since Ivan Nazaroff stories by Myrna Grant are considerably less well known than Narnia books by C S Lewis, known as Jack to his friends and family, I will give you some clues about him. His father once tells him his own grandfather was a property owner in Czar Russia. Oh, there were such who exploited the peasants horribly (admission to what was at least being taught in Communist schools and was perhaps true in places too), but not our ancestor back before the revolution. He tells him this in order to prepare him for his visit to exactly the same property - now a Kolkhos - and to tell him not to miss the opportunity to bring home his ancestor's family Bible. He does not miss the opportunity.
But in some ways the England of Susan Pevensie was as closed as the Soviet Union of Ivan Nazaroff - or if not, I am projecting back to English fifties what was going on in Swedish Seventies, Eighties, Nineties. You might as well know that about my novel. I am adressing that to give her an excuse to abandon Narnia in the first place, and also to give her an adventure.
If Ivan novels are novels in which Sovietic Atheism is the crook, then this is one in which Psychiatry takes that part. And indeed American and Swedish psychiatry collaborated with Chrustev's early on in the fifties. New criteria were added to what could stamp one as liable to be forced into their treatment, and I am far from sure claiming to have been to Narnia would not have been one of them. If she does not claim so, how can she avoid continuing the lie by which she placed her siblings in danger - or continue to be lied for and therefore placed in a very uncomfortable position?
If I had written this book chapter after chapter, I would obviously have placed this one after the previous and before the following. In reality I put it in the middle of extant chapters, of which I here give you the series in a table:
* This does not preclude thematics from the Seven Sacraments! If Jupiter could serve - obviously not dominate even according to such a Christian as would accept astrology - the Eucharist and Sun being lifegiving the Font, LWW would be the Eucharist novel and VDT the Baptism novel: in reality both sacraments are closer to VDT, and LWW is about the Calvary from which they flow - or about the Sacrifice of the Mass, if the Stone Table there, like the Mass in Our World is where the the Sacrifice of Calvary is renewed, made present. Mars and Confirmation go together, since in Confirmation we are clad in the armour of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit: PC is in a very key moment about Lucy first lacking then having the grace to stand up for her faith and for truth. Funny that Prince Caspian also alludes to political correctness which is an enemy of confirmation graces - and both abbreviate as PC. Moon goes well with the Sacrament that testifies of our fickleness, and at the end Aslan tells Jill "I will not always be scolding you". HHB gets people married (like Cor and Aravis), and that reminds of Venus (unless you think very hard about the Wedding of Mercury and Philology), MN gets Frank crowned, and that is as good a reminder of priesthood as Narnia across-the-wood-between-the-worlds gives us - the Umbrian one having of course Catholic clergy - and there you have Mercury since priests are preachers. Also the Magician Uncle serves Mercury as Hermes Trismegistos, which is a bad thing, but the criteria for King Frank are those Timothy had to apply to a "bishop". And Last Battle is about people not getting extreme unction, but dying in battle: and yet Narnia is by then sick, and calling for some kind of such. A bit like Oscar Wilde on his death bed in Paris (was the bar in Magdalen College Oxford already called Oscar Wilde bar in CSL's time there?). And obviously the seven fountainheads of sin are also seven. Jadis and Edmund start off as jealous. Miraz as angry. Eustace and Pug and Gumpas are all greedy. And so on? I mean, sevenfold underthemes for a seven book series need not be about just one of these underthemes./HGL
**Read up on it, Nobby's parents were dead, he left an uncle, and as he was fourteen he got to work immediately: with farmer Mackie. Sorry, Enid, bad memory of mine!
Like this thing about Planet Narnia: if Narnia books are astrologically set to Seven Classical Planets*, to what tune goes this? Uranus, Neptunus and, is Pluto a planet? One obvious answer is: to none. This is not a Narnia book. It is set in England and the only ground which hails to the name of Narnia is Narnese rather than Narnian. It is in Umbria in Italy, as author of original series well knew. It is set on earth, and if earth being central to universe and still without motion has no tune, some of its centuries do. Or one could say it is in tune with the fixed stars: a detail being that if geocentrism is true and yet sun is not center of all stars spread through space as thought by astronomers today, but fixed stars are more or less in a sphere, according to Bessel and others, they waggle a bit. But also in the sense that apart from waggling they are fixed and so is the moral law.
Susan Pevensie has naturally, without grace, a bit more courage than Ismene, or gives the impression. Yet she knows well there are laws that do not bend. Since the book is no tragedy I will not bring her to martyrdom as Antigone, but she will testify to "thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" and "thou shalt not kill" and "for anyone who scandalises one of these little ones, it would have been better if a millstone had been tied around his neck" - as a teacher in compulsory school in England, she does risk the millstone test. And, for passing it in the eyes of heaven, she pays.
But in a sense it is also another old favourite of mine apart from Narnia: Ivan Nazaroff. He knew he could not go to Chrustev and say "comrade Nikita, Christ died for my sins and yours, won't you read about it in the Bible with me"? And Susan Pevensie knew she could not stand up to England and say: "I am Queen of Narnia" - she would have aroused more panic than Jadis in London, as likely. The novels of Myrna Grant show the situation of Christians under Communism: Komsomol, Young Pioneers, Laws decreed unjustly by the party ... and teachers functioning under such laws.
Now, Psychiatry in the West has long functioned as such a Communist party. Children are materially supported even from non-wed mothers, but they are also taken away from parents more often than previous centuries and millennia. Back to days when adults were killed and children taken as slaves or for adoption by warriors whose names are known in the West. Was Attila the Hun in that branch? Genghis Khan I think was. Teachers are regularly concerned with both of these - as well as with Abortion, unless schools are Christian: not meaning every teacher gets involved personally, and when I taught for "6 months" (I was dismissed after expiration of contract) I was not approached by any teenage girl in such a situation, but if I had continued and been sufficiently respected, I am not sure how I could avoided situations in which either I would have tried to save a life by sabotaging policies about "it's her decision" (when she is approached by a pro-lifer) and "it's all for her own good" (when she is being pushed by the anti-lifers) - or earned a millstone around my neck.
Since Ivan Nazaroff stories by Myrna Grant are considerably less well known than Narnia books by C S Lewis, known as Jack to his friends and family, I will give you some clues about him. His father once tells him his own grandfather was a property owner in Czar Russia. Oh, there were such who exploited the peasants horribly (admission to what was at least being taught in Communist schools and was perhaps true in places too), but not our ancestor back before the revolution. He tells him this in order to prepare him for his visit to exactly the same property - now a Kolkhos - and to tell him not to miss the opportunity to bring home his ancestor's family Bible. He does not miss the opportunity.
But in some ways the England of Susan Pevensie was as closed as the Soviet Union of Ivan Nazaroff - or if not, I am projecting back to English fifties what was going on in Swedish Seventies, Eighties, Nineties. You might as well know that about my novel. I am adressing that to give her an excuse to abandon Narnia in the first place, and also to give her an adventure.
If Ivan novels are novels in which Sovietic Atheism is the crook, then this is one in which Psychiatry takes that part. And indeed American and Swedish psychiatry collaborated with Chrustev's early on in the fifties. New criteria were added to what could stamp one as liable to be forced into their treatment, and I am far from sure claiming to have been to Narnia would not have been one of them. If she does not claim so, how can she avoid continuing the lie by which she placed her siblings in danger - or continue to be lied for and therefore placed in a very uncomfortable position?
If I had written this book chapter after chapter, I would obviously have placed this one after the previous and before the following. In reality I put it in the middle of extant chapters, of which I here give you the series in a table:
| chapters "previous" to this | chapters "posterior" to this |
|---|---|
| previous and posterior refer to reading order only, they are previous to this in the writing order original four chapters in bold underlined | |
| Susan has a bad fright. Who told Susan: introducing Revd. Jinx Splendour Hyaline - again Off to Sevenoaks. The Car Ride to Sevenoaks was a Flashback Reverend Pewsey's Last Sermon Explanations of a Practical Nature St John's Feast in Narnia Helpers of the Holy Souls Nobby Susan reads her story again | Susan reads Lucy's essay on Astronomy Ramandu and Galileo, part 1 Ramandu and Galileo, part 2 Susan's Teacher Talk And Friedman looked for Su in the wrong office ... Jack and Tollers discuss pipeweed Where Aslan was a Lion Cub. [expanded since] A Glass of Cremisan with the Priest Father Brown's Last Bow, part 1 Father Brown's Last Bow, Part 2 Susan's dreams become a book |
* This does not preclude thematics from the Seven Sacraments! If Jupiter could serve - obviously not dominate even according to such a Christian as would accept astrology - the Eucharist and Sun being lifegiving the Font, LWW would be the Eucharist novel and VDT the Baptism novel: in reality both sacraments are closer to VDT, and LWW is about the Calvary from which they flow - or about the Sacrifice of the Mass, if the Stone Table there, like the Mass in Our World is where the the Sacrifice of Calvary is renewed, made present. Mars and Confirmation go together, since in Confirmation we are clad in the armour of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit: PC is in a very key moment about Lucy first lacking then having the grace to stand up for her faith and for truth. Funny that Prince Caspian also alludes to political correctness which is an enemy of confirmation graces - and both abbreviate as PC. Moon goes well with the Sacrament that testifies of our fickleness, and at the end Aslan tells Jill "I will not always be scolding you". HHB gets people married (like Cor and Aravis), and that reminds of Venus (unless you think very hard about the Wedding of Mercury and Philology), MN gets Frank crowned, and that is as good a reminder of priesthood as Narnia across-the-wood-between-the-worlds gives us - the Umbrian one having of course Catholic clergy - and there you have Mercury since priests are preachers. Also the Magician Uncle serves Mercury as Hermes Trismegistos, which is a bad thing, but the criteria for King Frank are those Timothy had to apply to a "bishop". And Last Battle is about people not getting extreme unction, but dying in battle: and yet Narnia is by then sick, and calling for some kind of such. A bit like Oscar Wilde on his death bed in Paris (was the bar in Magdalen College Oxford already called Oscar Wilde bar in CSL's time there?). And obviously the seven fountainheads of sin are also seven. Jadis and Edmund start off as jealous. Miraz as angry. Eustace and Pug and Gumpas are all greedy. And so on? I mean, sevenfold underthemes for a seven book series need not be about just one of these underthemes./HGL
**Read up on it, Nobby's parents were dead, he left an uncle, and as he was fourteen he got to work immediately: with farmer Mackie. Sorry, Enid, bad memory of mine!
Friday, May 11, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Lateranense V Concilii Sessio X
Leo PP X, in conc. Lateranense V
Sessio X, 4 maii 1515
De reformatione Montium Pietatis
Leo episcopus servus servorum Dei, ad perpetuam rei memoriam, sacro approbante concilio. Inter multiplices nostrae sollicitudinis curas, illam in primis suscipere pro nostro pastorali officio debemus, ut quae salubria, et laudabilia, ac catholicae fidei consona, et bonis moribus conformia, nostro tempore non solum enucleentur, verum etiam ad posteros propagentur: et quae materiam scandali praebere possent, penitus succidantur, et radicitus extirpentur, nec pullulare usquam sinentur, ea in agro dominico et vinea Domini sabaoth dumtaxatconseri permittendo, quibus fidelium mentes pasci spiritualiter possint, eradicatis zizaniis et oleastri sterilitate succisa. Sane cum olim inter nonnullos dilectos filios sacrae theologiae magistros ac iuris utriusque doctores, controversiam quandam non sine populorum scandalo et murmuratione exortam et nuper his diebus innovatam esse comperimus circa pauperum relevationem in mutuis eis publica auctoritate faciendis, qui montes pietatis vulgo appelantur, quique in multis Italiae civitatibus ad subveniendum per huiusmodi mutuum pauperum inopiae, ne usurarum voragine deglutiantur, a civitatum magistratibus et aliis Christi fidelibus sunt instituti atque a sanctis viris divini verbi praeconibus, et laudati, et persuasi, ac a nonnullis etiam summis pontificibus praedecessoribus nostris probati et confirmati sint, ne praefati montes a christiano dogmate dissonantes, vel non utraque parte diversimode sentiente atque praedicante. Nonnullis enim magistris et doctoribusdicentibus eos montes non esse licitos, in quibus aliquid ultra sortem pro libra, decurso certo tempore per ministros huius montis ab ipsis pauperibus, quibus mutuum datur, exigitur, et propterea ab usurarum crimine iniustitiave , seu ab aliqua certi specie mali mundos non evadere, cum Dominus noster, Luca evangelista attestante (6:35), aperto nos praecepto obstrinxerit, ne ex dato mutuo quidquam ultra sortem sperare debeamus. Ea enim propria est usurarum interpretatio, quando videlicet ex usu res, quae non germinat, nullo labore, nullo sumptu, nullove periculo lucrum foetusque conquiri studetur. Addebant etiam iidem magistri et doctores, in his montibus neque commutativae neque distributivae iustitiae fieri satis, cum tamen iustitiae terminos contractus huiusmodi excedere non debeant, si debeant approbari; idque praeterea probare nitebantur, quia impensae pro huiusmodi montium conservatione a pluribus (ut aiunt) debitae a solis pauperibus quibus mutuum datur extorquatur: pluraque interdum ultra necessarias et moderatas impensas, non absque specie mali ac incentivo delinquendi, quibusdam aliis personis (ut inferre videntur) exhibeantur. Aliis vero pluribus magistris et doctoribus contra asserentibus, et in multis Italiae gymnasiis verbo et scripto conclamantibus pro tanto bono, tamque reipublicae pernecessario, modo ratione mutui nihil petatur, nihil speretur: pro indemnitate tamen eorumdem montium huismodi lucro, idque moderatum et necessarium ab his, qui ex huiusmodi mutuo commodum recipiunt, licite ultra sortem exigi et capi posse nonnihil licere, cum regula iuris habeat, quod qui commodum sentit, onus quoque sentire debeat, praesertim si apostolica accedat auctoritas. Quam quidem sententiam a felicis recordationis Paulo II, Sixto IV, Innocentio VIII, Alexandro VI et Iulio II Romanis pontificibus praedecessoribus nostris probatam, a sanctis quoque ac Deo devotis, et in magna ob sanctitatis opinionem existimatione habitis evangelicae veritatis preadicationibus praedictam esse ostendunt. Nos super hoc (prout nobis est ex alto concessum) opportune providere volentes, alterius quidem partis iustitiae zelum, ne vorago aperiretur usurarum, alterius pietatis et veritatis amorem, ut pauperibus subveniretur: utriusque vero partis studium commendantes, cum haec ad pacem et tranquillitatem totius reipublicae christianae spectare videantur, sacro approbante concilio, declaramus et diffinimus, montes pietatis antedictos per respublicas institutos, et auctoritate sedis apostolicae hactenus probatos et confirmatos, in quibus pro eorum impensis et indemnitate aliquid moderatum ad solas ministrorum impensas et aliorum rerum ad illorum conservationem (ut praefertur) pertinentium, pro eorum indemnitati dumtaxat ultra sortem absque lucro eorumdem montium recipitur, neque speciem mali praeferre, nec peccandi incentivum praestare, neque ullo pacto improbari, quinimo meritorium esse, ac laudare et probari debere tale mutuum, minime usurarium putari, licereque illorum pietatem et misericordiam populis praedicare, etiam cum indulgentiis a sancta sede apostolica eam ob causam concessis: ac deinceps alios etiam similes montes cum apostolicae sedis approbatione erigi posse: multo tamen perfectius, multoque sanctius fore, si omnino tales montes pietatis gratuiti constituerentur, hoc est, si illos erigentes, aliquos census assignarent quibus si non omni, saltem vel media ex parte huiusmodi montium ministrorum solvantur impensae, ut ad leviorem aeris solvendi portionem medio hoc pauperes gravari contingat, ad quos, cume huiusmodi census assignatione, pro impensarum supportatione exigendos Christi fideles maioribus indulgentiis invitandos esse decernimus. Omnes autem religiosos et ecclesiasticas et saeculares personas, qui contra praesentis declarationis et snactionis formam de cetero praedicare seu disputare verbo vel scriptis ausi fuerint, excommunicationis latae sententiae poenam, privilegio quocumque non obstante, incurrere volumus, non obstantibus praemissis ac constitutionibus et ordinationibus apostolicis, ceterisque contrariis quibuscumque. Nullo ergo ... Si quis autem ...
Sessio X, 4 maii 1515
De reformatione Montium Pietatis
Leo episcopus servus servorum Dei, ad perpetuam rei memoriam, sacro approbante concilio. Inter multiplices nostrae sollicitudinis curas, illam in primis suscipere pro nostro pastorali officio debemus, ut quae salubria, et laudabilia, ac catholicae fidei consona, et bonis moribus conformia, nostro tempore non solum enucleentur, verum etiam ad posteros propagentur: et quae materiam scandali praebere possent, penitus succidantur, et radicitus extirpentur, nec pullulare usquam sinentur, ea in agro dominico et vinea Domini sabaoth dumtaxatconseri permittendo, quibus fidelium mentes pasci spiritualiter possint, eradicatis zizaniis et oleastri sterilitate succisa. Sane cum olim inter nonnullos dilectos filios sacrae theologiae magistros ac iuris utriusque doctores, controversiam quandam non sine populorum scandalo et murmuratione exortam et nuper his diebus innovatam esse comperimus circa pauperum relevationem in mutuis eis publica auctoritate faciendis, qui montes pietatis vulgo appelantur, quique in multis Italiae civitatibus ad subveniendum per huiusmodi mutuum pauperum inopiae, ne usurarum voragine deglutiantur, a civitatum magistratibus et aliis Christi fidelibus sunt instituti atque a sanctis viris divini verbi praeconibus, et laudati, et persuasi, ac a nonnullis etiam summis pontificibus praedecessoribus nostris probati et confirmati sint, ne praefati montes a christiano dogmate dissonantes, vel non utraque parte diversimode sentiente atque praedicante. Nonnullis enim magistris et doctoribusdicentibus eos montes non esse licitos, in quibus aliquid ultra sortem pro libra, decurso certo tempore per ministros huius montis ab ipsis pauperibus, quibus mutuum datur, exigitur, et propterea ab usurarum crimine iniustitiave , seu ab aliqua certi specie mali mundos non evadere, cum Dominus noster, Luca evangelista attestante (6:35), aperto nos praecepto obstrinxerit, ne ex dato mutuo quidquam ultra sortem sperare debeamus. Ea enim propria est usurarum interpretatio, quando videlicet ex usu res, quae non germinat, nullo labore, nullo sumptu, nullove periculo lucrum foetusque conquiri studetur. Addebant etiam iidem magistri et doctores, in his montibus neque commutativae neque distributivae iustitiae fieri satis, cum tamen iustitiae terminos contractus huiusmodi excedere non debeant, si debeant approbari; idque praeterea probare nitebantur, quia impensae pro huiusmodi montium conservatione a pluribus (ut aiunt) debitae a solis pauperibus quibus mutuum datur extorquatur: pluraque interdum ultra necessarias et moderatas impensas, non absque specie mali ac incentivo delinquendi, quibusdam aliis personis (ut inferre videntur) exhibeantur. Aliis vero pluribus magistris et doctoribus contra asserentibus, et in multis Italiae gymnasiis verbo et scripto conclamantibus pro tanto bono, tamque reipublicae pernecessario, modo ratione mutui nihil petatur, nihil speretur: pro indemnitate tamen eorumdem montium huismodi lucro, idque moderatum et necessarium ab his, qui ex huiusmodi mutuo commodum recipiunt, licite ultra sortem exigi et capi posse nonnihil licere, cum regula iuris habeat, quod qui commodum sentit, onus quoque sentire debeat, praesertim si apostolica accedat auctoritas. Quam quidem sententiam a felicis recordationis Paulo II, Sixto IV, Innocentio VIII, Alexandro VI et Iulio II Romanis pontificibus praedecessoribus nostris probatam, a sanctis quoque ac Deo devotis, et in magna ob sanctitatis opinionem existimatione habitis evangelicae veritatis preadicationibus praedictam esse ostendunt. Nos super hoc (prout nobis est ex alto concessum) opportune providere volentes, alterius quidem partis iustitiae zelum, ne vorago aperiretur usurarum, alterius pietatis et veritatis amorem, ut pauperibus subveniretur: utriusque vero partis studium commendantes, cum haec ad pacem et tranquillitatem totius reipublicae christianae spectare videantur, sacro approbante concilio, declaramus et diffinimus, montes pietatis antedictos per respublicas institutos, et auctoritate sedis apostolicae hactenus probatos et confirmatos, in quibus pro eorum impensis et indemnitate aliquid moderatum ad solas ministrorum impensas et aliorum rerum ad illorum conservationem (ut praefertur) pertinentium, pro eorum indemnitati dumtaxat ultra sortem absque lucro eorumdem montium recipitur, neque speciem mali praeferre, nec peccandi incentivum praestare, neque ullo pacto improbari, quinimo meritorium esse, ac laudare et probari debere tale mutuum, minime usurarium putari, licereque illorum pietatem et misericordiam populis praedicare, etiam cum indulgentiis a sancta sede apostolica eam ob causam concessis: ac deinceps alios etiam similes montes cum apostolicae sedis approbatione erigi posse: multo tamen perfectius, multoque sanctius fore, si omnino tales montes pietatis gratuiti constituerentur, hoc est, si illos erigentes, aliquos census assignarent quibus si non omni, saltem vel media ex parte huiusmodi montium ministrorum solvantur impensae, ut ad leviorem aeris solvendi portionem medio hoc pauperes gravari contingat, ad quos, cume huiusmodi census assignatione, pro impensarum supportatione exigendos Christi fideles maioribus indulgentiis invitandos esse decernimus. Omnes autem religiosos et ecclesiasticas et saeculares personas, qui contra praesentis declarationis et snactionis formam de cetero praedicare seu disputare verbo vel scriptis ausi fuerint, excommunicationis latae sententiae poenam, privilegio quocumque non obstante, incurrere volumus, non obstantibus praemissis ac constitutionibus et ordinationibus apostolicis, ceterisque contrariis quibuscumque. Nullo ergo ... Si quis autem ...
Saturday, April 7, 2012
Respuesta de un Carlista sobre Propriedad Privada y Montejurra '76
1) La Marcha de los indignados,
2) Carlismo de izquierda comunismo o no?,
3) Uno como otro no es malo como solución en algunos casos ...,
4) Respuesta de un Carlista sobre Propriedad Privada y Montejurra '76,
5) Despenalizar las relaciones sexuales entre adolescentes?,
6) Enfrente a un defensor de maraconías ...,
7) Cual fue la ley anterior a 1929?,
8) Quienes fueron los enemigos de los gitanos?,
9) Cuando Matteotti fue matado, Mussolini a condenado a los asesinos ....,
10) Mercado, estudios y otras cosas (entre carlistas en FB),
11) La tradición carlista como yo - un sueco - la conozco y honro.,
12) A transmeter a Esteban Morillo,
13) Hé leido que el video le inocenta!,
14) Contra el Maniqueismo
Mi pregunta:
La respuesta:
Mi pregunta:
Hola, Jesus-Maria: buen dia!
Majnó o Makhno (Nestor) no hablaba de "socialismo autogestionario", fue un ejemplo historico dado por un artículo wikipedia. Fue un anarquista quien había hecho ocho años de presión en Rusia antes de la Revolución, y una de las cosas en su programa fue de eliminar derechos de propriedad privada sobre todo typo de entrepresa. Eso no me parece justo. Pués fue liquidado por Estalín.
Soy escritor, aún poco en castellano, y pongo la questión dado que mi lealdad historica en España más es Carlista que Franquista, más un o otro que Azaña. Peró de eso de Montejurra 1976 sé muy poco.
Carlismo de Izquierda, Comunismo o no?
http://enfrancaissurantimodernism.blogspot.fr/2012/03/carlismo-de-izquierda-comunismo-o-no.html
La Marcha de Los Indignados (por Beauvais)
http://enfrancaissurantimodernism.blogspot.fr/2011/09/la-marcha-de-los-indignados.html
Voy ver el programa mañana.
Saludos,
Hans-Georg Lundahl
La respuesta:
Hola Hans-Georg: buen día.
Si el tal Mahkno era anarquista so estaba lejos de la Autogestión. Los Carlistas no estamos contra la propiedad privada, pero nunca por encima de la propiedad social; si tienes la posibilidad, concretada en la realidad, de tener tus necesidades básicas resueltas, ¿para qué necesitas poseer en exclusividad?. Te pondré un ejemplo: si ya y que nos hiztienes una casa en alquiler que no te van a quitar, a no ser que la estropees intencionadamente, ¿qué necesidad tienes de tener en propiedad una vivienda?; ahora bien, si aun así quieres tenerla, te la pagas y te la haces a tu gusto, pero sin quitar nada a nadie, sin explotar al conciudadano, ni a su costa.
Lo de Montejurra´76 fue una canallada de los poderes fácticos del tiempo, y que nos hizo mucho daño, pero sobre todo, mataron a dos personas y los asesinos se han librado de la Justicia.
Saludos.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Uno como otro no es malo como solución en algunos casos ...
... y en ciertos paises mismo en muchos casos:
[Peró primero la serie: 1) La Marcha de los indignados, 2) Carlismo de izquierda comunismo o no?, 3) Uno como otro no es malo como solución en algunos casos ..., 4) Respuesta de un Carlista sobre Propriedad Privada y Montejurra '76, 5) Despenalizar las relaciones sexuales entre adolescentes?, 6) Enfrente a un defensor de maraconías ..., 7) Cual fue la ley anterior a 1929?, 8) Quienes fueron los enemigos de los gitanos?, 9) Cuando Matteotti fue matado, Mussolini a condenado a los asesinos ...., 10) Mercado, estudios y otras cosas (entre carlistas en FB), 11) La tradición carlista como yo - un sueco - la conozco y honro., 12) A transmeter a Esteban Morillo, 13) Hé leido que el video le inocenta!, 14) Contra el Maniqueismo]
... peró los dos, tiendrán a respetar la libertad en eso que hay entrepresas donde los trabajadores son bien mismo sin estar en república, y hay entrepresas pequeñas que tienen de la llena libertad a propriedad privada, y también en eso que hay gente que no quieren irse tanto a la escuela que sean capaces a condirigir sus entrepresas.
En hecho, hay generaciones ya que se va a la escuela para ser "degni" o capaces - moralmente y tecnicalmente - de condirigir sus entrepresas, y no las condirigen, y ellos que no han hecho tanto de escuela no encurntran tan facilmente trabajo pagado.
Y olvidan un poco eso de León XIII: más trabajadores debrían ser propriedadores - es a decir privados. En pequeñas entrepresas.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
Georges Pompidou
Lunes de Semana Santa
(rito latín o uniado)
del Año del Señor 2012
[Peró primero la serie: 1) La Marcha de los indignados, 2) Carlismo de izquierda comunismo o no?, 3) Uno como otro no es malo como solución en algunos casos ..., 4) Respuesta de un Carlista sobre Propriedad Privada y Montejurra '76, 5) Despenalizar las relaciones sexuales entre adolescentes?, 6) Enfrente a un defensor de maraconías ..., 7) Cual fue la ley anterior a 1929?, 8) Quienes fueron los enemigos de los gitanos?, 9) Cuando Matteotti fue matado, Mussolini a condenado a los asesinos ...., 10) Mercado, estudios y otras cosas (entre carlistas en FB), 11) La tradición carlista como yo - un sueco - la conozco y honro., 12) A transmeter a Esteban Morillo, 13) Hé leido que el video le inocenta!, 14) Contra el Maniqueismo]
- I) fasci di combattimento:
...
per il problema soziale:
...
c) — La partecipazione dei rappresentanti dei lavoratori al funzionamento tecnico dell’industria.
d) — L’affidamento alle stesse organizzazioni proletarie (che ne siano degne moralmente e tecnicamente) della gestione di industrie o servizi pubblici.
- II) Partido carlista:
Creemos que la empresa del mañana debe ser una república del trabajo. La dirección de la empresa debe ser elegida por los propios trabajadores de la misma.
El capital necesario en cualquier empresa debe estar al servicio de esa república del trabajo: así ya no serán los trabajadores los servidores del capital sino a la inversa, siendo entonces el capital una herramienta en manos de los trabajadores.
Esta concepción de la empresa de autogestión permitirá devolver colectivamente a los trabajadores el dominio sobre su instrumento de producción.
...
El sindicato debe ser el conductor de análisis de las posibles economías y de las propuestas que, en cada nivel comarcal, regional, nacional, federal, etc, podrá proponer soluciones a los estamentos políticos de modo que , en cada uno de estos niveles, se pueda planificar la economía en función de las necesidades, de las posibilidades y de las metas alcanzables en el futuro.
... peró los dos, tiendrán a respetar la libertad en eso que hay entrepresas donde los trabajadores son bien mismo sin estar en república, y hay entrepresas pequeñas que tienen de la llena libertad a propriedad privada, y también en eso que hay gente que no quieren irse tanto a la escuela que sean capaces a condirigir sus entrepresas.
En hecho, hay generaciones ya que se va a la escuela para ser "degni" o capaces - moralmente y tecnicalmente - de condirigir sus entrepresas, y no las condirigen, y ellos que no han hecho tanto de escuela no encurntran tan facilmente trabajo pagado.
Y olvidan un poco eso de León XIII: más trabajadores debrían ser propriedadores - es a decir privados. En pequeñas entrepresas.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
Georges Pompidou
Lunes de Semana Santa
(rito latín o uniado)
del Año del Señor 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
